Wednesday December 27, 2006
Warmed hearts
Among the familiar readings of Nativity Stories over the Christmas seasons, there\’s one that\’s often overlooked.
Only Luke\’s gospel tells the story of Simeon and Anna. That shouldn\’t be surprising. The story of the Magi and the star appears only in Matthew. The stories of the census, the journey to Bethlehem, the manger and shepherds appear only in Luke. The gospels of Mark and John, and the letters of Paul, totally ignore the circumstances of Jesus\’ birth.
As Luke tells it, Mary and Joseph brought their child to the Temple in Jerusalem “to do for him what the Law required.” That is, to be circumcised.
They would have come alone. Other relatives must also have travelled to Bethlehem to register for the census. But Mary and Joseph had a child before wedlock. So there was “no room for them at the inn.”
In Luke\’s words, “There was a man named Simeon living in Jerusalem. … The Holy Spirit had assured him that he would not die before he had seen the Lord\’s promised Messiah. … When the parents brought the child Jesus into the Temple, Simeon took the child in his arms and gave thanks…”
An 84-year-old widow named Anna who stayed in the Temple day and night also came and “and spoke about the child to all who were waiting for God to set Jerusalem free.”
Comforting routine
I\’ve seen enough of eastern temples to know that they are a hive of activity. They\’re not like Canadian churches. One of the late Laurie Purdy\’s Clericature cartoons showed a tourist shaking a church door, saying, “It must be one of ours. It\’s locked!”
If Anna stayed at the Temple night and day, I suspect this would not be the only baby she approached. If aging Simeon hoped to see the Messiah before he died, this was probably not the only time he had gone to the Temple in hope.
So I think it unlikely that this was a one-time occurrence, even though we usually read that implication into the text.
I suspect it\’s possible, even likely, that both of them made a practice of greeting parents bringing their infants for circumcision – and at the same time, perhaps, for purifying the woman rendered ritually unclean by giving birth.
Like a grandparent, they probably got genuine joy from taking a new baby in their arms, from cuddling and cooing over him, from assuring the parents that this infant had a great future.
Not useless after all To receive this column regularly via e-mail, send a request to jimt@quixotic.ca. E-mail subscribers also get excerpts from correspondence about these columns. Please forward a copy of this column to anyone who might be interested in subscribing.
If you want to order my books, you can call 1-800-663-2775 in Canada, 1-800-328-0200 in the U.S., or order them on-line at the Wood Lake Books website.
For a lighter look at ethics, faith, and life, I recommend Ralph Milton\’s weekly e-newsletter Rumors. You can subscribe to it at the Wood Lake Books home page in Ralph Milton\’s Site, or by sending a note directly to ralphmilton@woodlake.com.
It\’s also worth pursuing Charlene Fairchild\’s United Online site. Another site worth visiting is David Keating\’s \”SeemslikeGod\” page.
If one of those babies turned out to be the promised Messiah, they would be proven right. If not, they did no more harm than we do when we peer into a baby carriage and declare, “What a beautiful baby!”
My interpretation doesn\’t make Jesus any less significant. He would still be the linchpin of history — prophet, rebel, healer, victim, God\’s special revelation…
But my heart feels strangely warmed that two elderly — and by the standards of their time, socially useless — people could perform a role that warmed parents\’ hearts.
=====================================
Copyright © 2006 by Jim Taylor. Non-profit use in congregations and study groups permitted; all other rights reserved.
=====================================
PROMOTION PLUGS
