Sunday July 5, 2009
Central America plunged back into chaos
By Jim Taylor
A military coup in a Latin American nation sounds as routine as afternoon tea in England. It feels a bit different if you\’ve been there.
Joan and I took a holiday in Honduras last January. I was a little nervous about going. Much of my exposure to Central America came while brutal civil wars raged in the region.
Reports from church workers and missionaries tended to blame government forces and right-wing paramilitaries who slaughtered their imagined enemies with apparent impunity.
Neither religion nor nationality offered security. Nuns were raped, priests murdered. Archbishop Oscar Romero was gunned down in his cathedral while celebrating Mass.
But the Canadian government website stated that Honduras had been relatively stable since the 1980s, with a democratically elected and generally respected government.
So we went. And enjoyed our visit. Indeed, we were thinking of taking our daughter and grandchildren back with us next winter.
Then last Sunday morning, about 100 soldiers stormed the presidential residence, seized president Manuel Zelaya at gun point, and exiled him in his pyjamas to Costa Rica.
The lead up
The chain of events seems clear, even if the outcome remains cloudy. President Zelaya wanted to amend the Constitution, partly to allow him to run for an extra term.
The country was going to the polls on Sunday – not to extend his term, as the western media have incorrectly reported, but to decide whether to include in the November election an option “to decide whether to hold a Constituent National Assembly that will approve a new political constitution.”
That\’s a direct translation of the words on the ballot.
It was not, in other words, a referendum on extending Zelaya\’s tenure. It asked the people whether they wanted their constitution reopened.
As in many poor countries – Pakistan is a classic example – the military is about the only functioning social infrastructure. So the military had the job of distributing ballots.
The general in charge, Romeo Vasquez, refused.
Zelaya fired Vasquez June 24.
June 28, Vasquez\’ troops staged the coup.
Media reports of the coup have consistently described Zelaya as a leftist, who had formed alliances with Venezuela\’s president Hugo Chavez and Bolivia\’s Evo Morales – as if that justified the Honduran army\’s actions.
The background
When, oh when, will it dawn on American analysts that the threat is never from the left. Without exception, current left-leaning governments – Brazil, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, Chile – have all been democratically elected. Some leftist governments have emerged out of revolutionary struggles – Nicaragua and Cuba, for example – but I cannot think of a single instance of a leftist regime seizing power through a military coup.
But there\’s a long history of U.S. involvement in right-wing military interventions. For several decades, the leaders of every military regime were trained in counter-insurgency tactics at the School of the Americas. Augusto Pinochet was one. Romeo Vasquez was another.
The guns wielded by Zelaya\’s captors were made in America. The Air Force plane that flew Zelaya to Costa Rica was purchased with dollars supplied by U.S. military aid.
“It\’s impossible to imagine that the U.S. was not aware that the coup was in the works,” fumed international correspondent Jeremy Scahill. “U.S. ties to the Honduran military run far too deep…”
Whether the U.S. was truly involved is almost immaterial. Latin Americans recall U.S. backing for Brazil\’s military junta in the 1960s, the Pinochet regime in Chile in the 1970s, the Contras in Nicaragua in the 1980s, the militias in El Salvador and Guatemala into the 1990s. They believe the U.S. was behind attempts to unseat Chavez in 2002, and Morales in 2008.
History suggests that U.S. policy makers prefer right-wing dictatorships to left-wing democracies. Their record contradicts their rhetoric.
The reason is greed. It\’s easier to make money under a right-wing regime than under a left-leaning one. Leftist leaders are not necessarily any more ethical or any less corrupt than rightist – witness the Kremlin — but all leftist governments believe that they have a duty is to govern for the good of their people. Rightist governments believe in the accumulation of wealth – personal and/or corporate.
It suggests that the strings of U.S. foreign policy are pulled, not by national security or altruistic principle, but by corporate profits. Whenever corporate profits are threatened, the U.S. backs a military takeover.
Growing reaction
Certainly corporate interests were threatened in Honduras. Zelaya raised the minimum wage by 60 per cent. He condemned sweatshops in the so-called free trade zones. He joined ALBA, the leftist Latin American coalition.
But this time, the coup may not achieve its goals as easily. The coup has been unanimously denounced – by the White House, by the Organization of American States, by the United Nations… Two elite battalions have said they will not obey new president Roberto Micheletti. Thousands of protesters took to the streets, burned cars, blocked highways, or went on strike. Indeed, Tegucigalpa looked a lot like Tehran, with police using tear gas, clubs, and water cannon to disperse protesters.
The coup may well provoke a renewed civil war.
I guess we\’re not taking the grandchildren to Honduras this winter after all.
=====================================
Copyright © 2009 by Jim Taylor. Non-profit use in congregations and study groups permitted; all other rights reserved.
Please tell your friends about these columns. To send comments, to subscribe or to unsubscribe, or to request permission to reprint, write jimt@quixotic.ca Be sure to include Soft Edges or Sharp Edges in the subject line, so my spam filter doesn\’t delete your message.
=====================================
Your Turn
Sorry, no mail this week. That doesn\’t mean there wasn\’t any – just that it is stored on my computer at home, and I\’m in Edmonton, helping to care for grandchildren. That\’s also the reason this column is late – grandchildren take an extraordinary amount of time and energy, and I simply didn\’t get around to sending this out until Sunday night.
I\’m sure there are easy ways of copy Thunderbird\’s e-mail files from one computer to another, but I haven\’t found it yet, and so when I leave my home office and start working out of our daughter\’s house, I\’m bereft of files.
Incidentally, the call for help came because our daughter Sharon – a self-employed single mom with two adopted children – came down with double pneumonia and was hospitalized for a week.
=====================================
About My Paraphrases
Occasionally, I get frustrated by the Bible. Not usually by the message, which is timeless, but by the language and metaphor. Contemporary translations update the language, but not the metaphor, so the text still expects us to respond to images of deserts and tents, camels and droughts, kings and concubines. What we\’ve learned since the Bible was written — about psychology and evolution, about quantum physics and astronomy, computers and fossil fuels – is simply left out.
At such times, I start paraphrasing. I don\’t pretend that these paraphrases rely on new translations of original texts. They are, rather, my way of writing what I think the original writers might have said IF they lived today. Sometimes I stick close to the traditional versification; sometimes I take liberties.
My paraphrase of Paul\’s letter to the Romans attempts to put Paul\’s sometimes convoluted words — and argument — into a contemporary setting. If Paul were writing today, to the Christian church, I\’m not sure he\’d worry as much about the failure of the Jews to follow Christ as about the failure of Christians to follow Christ, so I have rephrased in those terms. I suspect he would also make use of quotations from the Gospels — which of course didn\’t exist when he wrote his letters — rather than using quotations from the only scriptures he had available, which we call the Old Testament.
About 200 people have requested the paraphrase of Romans, as an electronic file.
I now have two new paraphrases available, for Ecclesiastes and Job. Ecclesiastes sticks pretty much to the biblical flow of verses – though with, I hope, some sense of humour. Job cuts 42 chapters down to about three pages. I found the speeches in Job interminable; the only way I could make sense of the various characters\’ verbal meanderings was to turn them into television sound-bites.
I\’m making these available the same way as Romans – on the honor system. You send me an e-mail and request the file you want. I\’ll send it. If you like it, and want to keep it, you send me a cheque for $5 by snail mail. If you don\’t like it, simply erase it from your hard disk and send nothing.
=====================================
TECHNICAL STUFF
To comment on something, in these columns, send a message directly to me, at jimt@quixotic.ca.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send me an e-mail message at the addresses above. Or you can subscribe electronically by sending a blank e-mail (no message) to sharpedges-subscribe@quixotic.ca. Similarly, you can un-subscribe at sharpedges-unsubscribe@quixotic.ca.
You can access several years of archived columns at http://edges.Canadahomepage.net.
I write a second column each Wednesday, called Soft Edges, which deals somewhat more gently with issues of life and faith. (It\’s also included in Ralph Milton\’s e-newsletter Rumors.) To sign up for Soft Edges, write to me directly, at the addresses above, or send a note to softedges-subscribe@quixotic.ca
********************************************
PROMOTION STUFF…
If you know someone else who might like to receive this column regularly via e-mail, send a request to jimt@quixotic.ca. Or, if you wish, forward them a copy of this column. But please put your name on it, so they don\’t think I\’m sending out spam.
For a lighter look at life, faith, and the lectionary, I recommend my friend Ralph Milton\’s weekly e-newsletter Rumors. You can subscribe to it by sending a note to ralphmilton@woodlake.com.
For other web links worth pursuing, try
- Charlene Fairchild\’s United Online site,
- David Keating\’s “SeemslikeGod” page
- The Canadian Centre for Progressive Christianity home page
- Dan Strizek\’s Gathering Place for Creation Spirituality
- Alva Wood\’s satiric stories about incompetent bureaucrats and prejudiced attitudes in a small town are not terribly religious, but they are fun; write alvawood@gmail.com to get onto her mailing list.
- Jim Henderschedt\’s occasional e-zine, Fresh Water, subscribe by writing him, jimbet1219@verizon.net
********
