Sunday March 7, 2010
A tale of two earthquakes
By Jim Taylor
Chile gets hit with an earthquake that’s 900 times more destructive than Haiti’s, but has less than one per cent of the deaths.
What gives here?
It’s more than a matter of population density.
The Haitian earthquake measured 7.0 in magnitude; the Chilean, 8.8. But those figures are misleading. The magnitude scale of earthquakes (formerly called the Richter Scale) is exponential. That means an 8.0 earthquake is not just one-eighth stronger than a 7.0 earthquake, but ten times stronger.
To complicate matters further, this magnitude scale measures the shaking amplitude of the vibrations, but not the amount of energy released, an earthquake’s true destructive power.
On that basis, an 8.0 earthquake releases 31.6 times as much energy as a 7.0 earthquake. So the Chilean quake was roughly 30-times-30 more violent than the Haitian quake – hence the “900 times” quoted in news reports.
What causes earthquakes?
As the physical scars heal in Haiti, the emotional scars remain. Francesca Paola Crabu, a clinical psychologist with Médicins Sans Frontiéres, believes that many Haitians consider the earthquake a sign of “religious punishment.”
It’s not. But that requires a quick refresher course in Geology 101.
Despite the impressions we get from our senses, the earth is neither flat nor solid.
Far beneath the surface we walk on, there’s a massive layer of semi-fluid rock. Think of the consistency of congealed tar – thick, almost solid, but capable of being deformed by heat and pressure.
And it’s exceedingly hot.
Like water boiling in a saucepan, this hot gel develops local convection currents. It circulates, slowly but steadily.
The solid earth we know floats on top of this roiling semi-fluid, like foam on top of a café latté.
Now think of that circulating gel filling, say, a soccer ball. Except that the pieces of leather that form the skin of the soccer ball are not stitched together. As the sauce inside circulates, the pieces of leather tend to drift along with it.
Those pieces of leather are our continents. They seem huge to us but they’re actually flotsam swept along by invisible currents.
And just like debris swirling in a stream, sometimes one edge of a continent is pushed westward by one current, while the opposite edge runs into a contrary eddy that wants it to go eastward.
That’s what happened in the ocean depths off Chile. A westward moving continent rode up over an eastward moving oceanic plate.
Different kinds of crashes
Of course, all of this happens in extreme slow motion. About one inch a year. But if you could take one frame of a movie every year, over a million years you would see the western edge of South America crumpling like the front end of a car hitting a concrete wall.
The Andes mountain range is the visible result of that continental crumpling.
Some car crashes happen head-on; some strike glancing blows. The Chilean quake was a head-on crash. The Haitian earthquake was a glancing blow, as two continental plates tried to skid past each other.
Once you grasp this process, you can see that earthquakes are inexorable. They have nothing to do with human misbehaviour. Continental plates do not care what human hitchhikers may be doing on their surface. So earthquakes cannot be punishment for anything – unless you consider it morally wrong to live in an earthquake-prone part of the world.
Unfortunately for us, some of the most desirable real estate in the world lies in earthquake zones. The Caribbean islands, for example. And the entire Pacific Rim, from Cape Horn through the Mexican Riviera, through California, the B.C. coast, across Alaska’s Aleutian islands to Japan, the Philippines, the Polynesian islands, New Zealand…
Chile is particularly earthquake prone. The world’s strongest recorded earthquake (9.5 magnitude) struck there in 1960. Six of the world’s most destructive earthquakes (8.5 or greater) have been centred in the ocean trench just off its shores. Anywhere else, its aftershocks would rate as major earthquakes.
Earthquakes will happen whether or not humans happen to live in the area.
The human factor
The extent of damage, however, can be directly linked to human involvement.
Chile had less property damage and far fewer deaths, because it had building codes. Long considered the most European nation in Latin America, Chile requires steel reinforcement, properly mixed concrete, tested materials…. It has universities turning out professional engineers. It has building inspectors….
Haiti, by contrast, is free enterprise taken to an extreme. Anyone who believes that government should stay out of people’s lives should spend some time in Haiti.
Anything goes. For cars, buses, buildings… If it doesn’t fall down or break down, it’s okay to use.
Chile also has efficient social agencies – police, fire departments, military units, health services — able to respond to emergencies. They may not have operated as efficiently as desired. But that’s still better than Haiti, which had no functioning social infrastructure at all.
That’s why a smaller earthquake did much more damage in Haiti than a much bigger one did in Chile. It has nothing to do with divine retribution; it has a lot to do with human societies.
=====================================
Copyright © 2009 by Jim Taylor. Non-profit use in congregations and study groups permitted; all other rights reserved.
Please tell your friends about these columns. To send comments, to subscribe or to unsubscribe, or to request permission to reprint, write [email protected] Be sure to include Soft Edges or Sharp Edges in the subject line, so my spam filter doesn’t delete your message.
=====================================
Your Turn
“I admit to being caught up in the Olympics,” wrote Jean Skillman, “the pageantry, the medals, the adrenaline of winning, the bitterness of losing, the pleasure of participation. So many of these athletes perform at levels that are entirely equal: nanoseconds apart in timing. For me, those tiny distinctions are meaningless.
“I agree that just being a participant is cause for celebration. CBC did some radio stories about poor countries who send one athlete who has had only family support to become a world athlete because the country is poor both economically and in governance… Mostly, we see the sacrifice as it relates to the ones who win, or the ones of our own country. I do not object to knowing about Canadian athletes, and I hope other countries are covering their athletes, but a broader base of journalism rounds the story out. Those who lose by the definitions of the medals are often athletes whose achievement is deserving of heroic story. I appreciate those stories for their complex truths, and hope that more will be told.”
Cliff Boldt noted, “It was good that you singled out a few of the special moments at these games. There were others, no doubt, depending on one’s special interests. Curling is my favourite and we witnessed some of the best curling ever, anywhere.”
Old friend Lee d’Anjou had some thoughts about the controversy over Canada’s “Own the Podium” slogan: “My son, who knows something about entertainment, says the Canadian Olympic Committee could have avoided all the fuss by removing just one letter from the slogan. ‘On the Podium’ would have made the same point” without sounding arrogant.
Krista Markstrom indulged in a small rant: “What has become of us — the USA or any other country — when all that seems to matter is who has won the most medals… I’m really excited for the American Bobsled team that they won the gold for the first time in 62 years. THAT is a wonderful achievement. I’m disgusted with the USA for [criticizing] an exhausted Lindsey Vonn for returning the to the US exhausted with ONLY two medals, failing to achieve her medal goal….
“Yes, your lovely Canadian figure skater, Joannie Rochette, is someone whom I greatly admire for her courage and her commitment to her mother to go on the ice to show the world the depth of love a mother and daughter held for each other. And then there’s the Canadian hockey team who won gold! HOORAY! [But] I’m just as proud of the US Hockey team for winning silver. Their athletic performances were stellar!
“But, what I want to do is go back. Go back to the ’60s and ’70s when the US media wasn’t worried about their ratings and advertisers’ monies to focus on the many incredible world athletes. When we loved French Alpine skier Jean-Claude Killy as much as the French. Or when the underdogs of any country/nation/state won over any other country! Those were moments to be savoured as true Olympic torches.
“I’m sorry that Canada has as one if its least glorious moments an ad for young girls (and boys, too, I’m sure) to sell bodies and souls [as] objects of sexual gratification. For too many of these young people, their depths of despair will just have begun to besmirch lives as the Olympics end. Unfortunately, Canada is not different from other countries to use to its economic advantage prostitutes and athletes alike.”
Finally, Kevin Clarkson took issue with an implication in my column: “It seems very Canadian to me that some would say it is ‘Un-Canadian’ to want to win! I celebrated all of the same moments that you did, Jim, but I also celebrated those that won. You seem to suggest in your column that it is better to lose, and those that won should somehow be ashamed they did so. All the athletes were there to compete, and all the ones that tried and didn’t win, were winners for simply trying, but, all of them wanted to win Gold, even Joannie Rochette. All of us need to have a bit of the Olympian spirit and strive to be the best we can be, without fear that someone might accuse us of not being properly ‘humble’. I, for one, enjoyed every moment of these Games and, the icing on the cake, we won some medals too!
“These young people represent the best of us, not just in their physical abilities and skills, but in their dedication, determination, and courage. There are always those with less than admirable purposes and intent who take advantage of these events. I choose not to focus on them.”
=====================================
About My Books
Over the years, I think I have written (or ghostwritten) about 17 books. Several of them (mercifully) are no longer available from any source. But here’s a listing of those that are still available. The ones marked “WLB”, you can order from Wood Lake Books, either on-line at http://www.woodlakebooks.com, or call Wood Lake Books directly at 1-800-663-2775 in Canada, 1-800-654-5129 (Pilgrim Press) in the U.S. The ones marked “JT only” are now available only directly from me — as collector’s items, I price them all at $25 Cdn.
- Everyday God: Insights from the Ordinary
- Two Worlds in One
- Last Chance
- Seeing the Mystery: Exploring Christian Faith through the Eyes of Artists,
- Surviving Death
- Everyday Psalms
- Everyday Parables
- Letters to Stephen
- A New Understanding of Virtue and Vice
- Precious Days and Practical Love: Caring for an Aging Parent
- John for Beginners
- Spirituality of Pets
(1981 and 2005, WLB, $19.95)
(1985, JT only)
(1989, JT only)
(1990, with William S. Taylor, JT only)
(1993, JT only)
(1994 and 2005, WLB, $19.95)
(1995 and 2005, WLB, $19.95)
(1996, WLB, $17.95)
(1997, WLB, $19.95)
(1999, WLB, $19.95)
(2001, WLB, $11.95)
(2006, WLB, $39)
=====================================
TECHNICAL STUFF
To comment on something, in these columns, send a message directly to me, at [email protected].
To subscribe or unsubscribe, send me an e-mail message at [email protected]. Or you can subscribe electronically by sending a blank e-mail (no message) to [email protected]. Similarly, you can un-subscribe at [email protected].
You can access several years of archived columns at http://edges.Canadahomepage.net.
I write a second column each Wednesday, called Soft Edges, which deals somewhat more gently with issues of life and faith. (It’s also included in Ralph Milton’s e-newsletter Rumors.) To sign up for Soft Edges, write to me directly, at [email protected], or send a note to [email protected]
********************************************
PROMOTION STUFF…
If you know someone else who might like to receive this column regularly via e-mail, send a request to [email protected] Or, if you wish, forward them a copy of this column. But please put your name on it, so they don’t think I’m sending out spam.
For a lighter look at life, faith, and the lectionary, I recommend my friend Ralph Milton’s weekly e-newsletter Rumors. You can subscribe to it by sending a note to [email protected]
For other web links worth pursuing, try
- Charlene Fairchild’s United Online site,
- David Keating’s “SeemslikeGod” page
- The Canadian Centre for Progressive Christianity home page
- Dan Strizek’s Gathering Place for Creation Spirituality
- Alva Wood’s satiric stories about incompetent bureaucrats and prejudiced attitudes in a small town are not terribly religious, but they are fun; write [email protected] to get onto her mailing list.
*****************************************
